Automation Impact Dividend (AID) - Draft Proposal

Preamble: The AID Imperative.

Automation is accelerating. AI, robotics, and software are lifting productivity everywhere. That's genuinely good news. But the transition has sharp edges. Income swings. Disrupted careers. Deep anxiety in communities that lose roles faster than new ones appear. The IMF says almost 40% of global employment is exposed to AI. In advanced economies it could be as high as 60%. Goldman Sachs projects that AI might lift corporate profits by 30% or more over the next ten years. At the same time, roughly 18% of existing jobs face a high probability of being automated. That's about 300 million full‑time‑equivalent positions exposed globally.

This isn't a sudden cliff. It's a structural shift. The challenge is to navigate it fairly, and democratically. The goal of AID is simple. Keep society stable while innovation scales. Share a small slice of automation‑linked gains with the people most affected. The defining innovation is a tripartite distribution model. Business, government, and people each hold a genuine stake. No single institution can control the flow of support. That makes the system anti‑fragile. It gets stronger under stress.

We've built three defining features right into the core of AID. The levy pool becomes a sovereign wealth‑style endowment that compounds forever. Every citizen gets baby bonds and automatic asset accounts from birth. And governance is pushed to the local level, with regional Trusts instead of one distant global body. These aren't extras. They're the engine that turns a safety net into a wealth‑building machine.

Core Principles of AID Design

1. Eligibility and Targeting

2. Payment Structure

3. Distribution Mechanism

4. Funding and Accountability - The Endowment Engine

Democratic Architecture: Regional Trusts and Subsidiarity

AID isn't governed from one global headquarters. Power flows to the lowest effective level. We'll have a network of regional AID Trusts - North America, Europe, and others - each with its own tri‑chamber board. Citizen representatives, labour delegates, and business seats. Major decisions require supermajority consent across the three chambers. No single bloc can rewrite the rules.

Regional Trusts operate under a shared multi‑lateral treaty. That treaty locks in the core principles - profit‑threshold funding, the 7% cap, inflation indexing, baby bonds, and citizen voting rights. A transnational Arbitration Panel can rule on breaches by any signatory government. Dividend units and baby bond accounts are portable across borders. You move, your stake moves with you.

Rotating citizen audit juries add another layer. Every two years, a random panel of citizens reviews a sample of displacement decisions and levy assessments. They publish findings straight to the public dashboard and to parliamentary oversight committees. Council member terms are staggered and sunsetted. No entrenched class can form.

Workplace Democracy: Co‑Determination on Automation

Firms above the profit‑threshold trigger must set up works councils or automation‑impact committees. Elected employee representatives sit on them. They review planned AI deployments, negotiate retraining and internal redeployment before anyone triggers a claim, and publish an annual Automation Impact Statement. That statement feeds into the firm's label score and the public dashboard. This keeps civic muscle alive inside the workplace. People aren't just passive recipients of a dividend. They have a voice in how automation arrives.

Why this matters now?

AI is moving from novelty to infrastructure. The OECD confirms accelerating adoption by firms and widespread use by individuals. The ILO's latest work on generative AI stresses that jobs will be transformed rather than instantly removed. Transition design matters enormously. Income stability matters. Skills matter. And democratic voice matters most of all.

Key points (quick reading)